The owner of this website has discovered yet again that the team at Lotto Billions is seeking to suppress factual information and honest opinions regarding the authenticity of their business and their management team’s credibility.
In a removal request submitted to Google last week (see below), the third it has sent, a company representative claimed that this website and its blog content are defamatory, malicious, and untrue.
The publisher of this website contests every claim. All direct statements expressed within this website are based on facts which are either referenced through links to, or screenshots of, information already in the public domain, or with irrefutable evidence that (at this point) can only be disclosed to law enforcement and/or in a court of law. The honestly held opinions expressed are based on these facts.
While the primary purpose of this review website is to give the public a complete understanding of the risks associated with Lotto Billions and its unorthodox business operations, the complaint highlights the existence of a more specific group who need to be able to access its contents. Namely, the “partners and current and potential investors” Lotto Billions are approaching.
In the world of investments, details matter, and due diligence is paramount. However, the availability of comprehensive information can be hindered by individuals seeking to conceal or manipulate their online presence, leaving potential investors in a precarious position.
To date, this website and blogs have revealed the disturbing facts about Lotto Billions and the team behind it, including:
That the CEO, the only director and shareholder, has a troubling history of domestic violence, issuing conflicting statements regarding the true ownership of Lotto Billions and whose own property company has been subject to multiple compulsory strike-off actions.
That the CSO and Co-Founder is a con man, marked by bankruptcy, litigation for obtaining funding from banks via misrepresentation, and a trail of failed companies.
That another Co-Founder boasts a perfect record of business failures, with his only venture ending in collapse.
That the self-professed Legal Counsel lacks the necessary qualifications of a lawyer, carries a conviction for drunk driving, and has a long list of failed companies behind him.
That the head of marketing operates on a freelance basis, distancing himself from any public association with the company.
That other regional directors, ostensibly existing according to public perception, are conspicuously absent from regulatory filings.
Against this backdrop of numerous red flags, the urgency of ringing alarm bells becomes undeniable. Anyone parting with money to this team either as a customer or investor, should undoubtedly have access to these facts to get a clear picture of what and who they are dealing with.
Given the above, the Lotto Billions complaint is nothing more than a blatant attempt to suppress and hide information that is highly pertinent to any person or company that is considering providing funding or endorsement to be used in this operation and the team behind it. Such actions further compound the suspicions surrounding them and their questionable practices.
The publisher of this website and its blogs refutes the spurious claims made in the complaint and no doubt, Google will concur.
[Source: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39805013/request_access]
Defamation Complaint to Google
SENDER
[REDACTED]
[Private]GBSent on February 26, 2024COUNTRY: GB 🇬🇧
RECIPIENT
Google LLC
[Private]Mountain View, CA, 94043, US
SUBMITTER
Google LLC
Re: Unknown
NOTICE TYPE: Defamation
Legal Complaint
We are of the view that the content in the above URL is unlawful as it amounts to defamation and malicious falsehood under the law in the UK.
Defamation
The content on this page clearly amounts to libel under both common law in the UK, as well as the UK Defamation Act 2013. Under common law, a claimant needs to show that the statement (1) is defamatory and will lower the perception of the claimant in the minds of right-thinking members of society;
(2) identifies and refers to them; and
(3) is published to a third party. Under the Defamation Act 2013, there is a further element under section 1(1) that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant.
Element 1: Words and expressions are considered defamatory if in its natural and ordinary meaning, it would lower the claimant in the eyes of right-thinking members of society, or if it adversely affects the attitude of other people towards the claimant. It has also been held before that certain statements will always be defamatory, for example “[Individual Name] is dishonest”.
There are several terms of this nature on this page referring to myself ([REDACTED] [REDACTED]) such as “con men”, “bullies” being examples. There could be no other meaning of these words, they are self-explanatory.
Element 2: I am also identified by name within this page multiple times, specifically in the context of being a “thief”. I have never been charged or convicted or even accused of any type of theft. This is clearly defamatory.
Element 3: The statement is on this page (along with others referring to me on other pages) and is therefore published on http://www.lottobillions.co.uk
Element 4: This page and its contents have caused me serious harm (both to my reputation and financially), on a balance of probabilities. I was notified about this page by a third-party affiliate of the business I co-founded, who then launched an internal investigation reevaluating their firm’s partnership with my business. This was a direct result of a shift in perception due to this publication about me. Referring to the UK landmark case of Bruno Lachaux, analogically speaking, the content on this page causes serious harm to my reputation both as a businessman and personally.
Malicious Falsehood
Additionally, the content published on this page also amounts to malicious falsehood, which is also unlawful under UK law. Under common law, a claimant needs to show that (1) there was malicious publication, (2) the statements were untrue, (3) the claimant was identified in the page, and
(4) there was financial loss suffered by the claimant. I am of the view that the content published on this page satisfies all the abovementioned elements.
Element 1: The statements must have been intended to be published, and done so with an improper motive. Malice can be (1) knowledge that the statements were false, (2) recklessness as to the truth of the statements at the time of publication, or (3) honest belief of truth in the statements but published with the intention of injuring the claimant’s interests. I believe that the statements made on this page at the very least fall under (3).
Element 2: The statements are objectively untrue – the statements have no basis and cites a “source” with no further reference to actual events.
Element 3: I was directly identified once, and subsequently referred to in a group that was clearly defined as being myself and two other gentlemen, multiple times across the entire page. The page also directly identifies and links to a business that I am heavily involved in.
Element 4: In relation to financial loss, an exemption under section 3(1) of the 1952 Defamation Act applies to me: the words are calculated to cause pecuniary damage to me in respect of my business that I am carrying on at the time of this publication. Specifically, my business is undergoing a funding round, and it is at this time that my reputation before current and potential investors is incredibly important. This page is specifically designed to disrupt our funding efforts and cause pecuniary damage to my business. …
URLS OF ALLEGEDLY DEFAMATORY MATERIAL:
- https://lottobillions-scam.com/convicted-wife-beater-and-drunk-driver-unite-to-lead-lotto-billions/
- https://lottobillions-scam.com/ixchel-khalid-virani-the-drunk-lawyers-restaurant/
- https://lottobillions-scam.com/the-lotto-billions-scam/
- https://lottobillions-scam.com/lotto-billions-involved-in-a-criminal-investigation-harassment-assault-fraudulent-practices/
- https://lottobillions-scam.com/shady-associates-russian-connections-and-dubious-directors-lottobillions/
- https://lottobillions-scam.com/the-wiley-foxes-of-lotto-billions-go-phishing-again/
- https://lottobillions-scam.com/when-a-lawyer-spends-time-at-the-wrong-kind-of-bar/
JURISDICTIONS
GB
TOPICS
Defamation
TAGS
